A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier and the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building performs at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their spouse and children home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of recognized citizens. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the motion as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely famous that this sort of actions were being cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected in detail with the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential instant while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean all through a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced previously been linked to Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of waistline-higher water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both the Actual physical truth on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an abnormal approach.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket ought to figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with arranging authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Particular Spot of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Dwell alongside one another very long once the authorized charges are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre of the dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Irrespective of whether it can eventually be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as prepared will depend upon the court docket’s findings. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will possible proceed to look in headlines, linked indelibly to The most intently watched setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.