A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier along with the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall outside of the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result spots are subject matter to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of the sea are each hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been included in detail from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second within the legal timeline.
On the core Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely of the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as constructed, goes past what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and circumstances hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is motivated by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have explained their long-standing link to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few merely endeavoring to develop a spouse and children property in accordance with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all will work have been carried out according to Qualified assistance and permitted plans. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into the sea through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is now much more contentious.
The Irish Moments report about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.